EssayDone
The first Basic 4.5 output was easy to obtain, but changed the staff's sentiment and reversed parts of the opening-hours discussion. The result needs a factual repair, not just polishing.
Website screenshot

Original and rewritten result
Basic 4.5 / default strength 10 of 10 toward More Human. Same benchmark; first complete output. Open any screenshot to inspect the original capture.


Original · 93 words
A local library tested a four-day schedule for six weeks. It kept the same 40 weekly opening hours, closing Wednesdays and extending Monday and Thursday evenings. Visits rose from 1,200 to 1,320 a week, although Wednesday visitors had to change plans. Staff reported fewer interruptions, but productivity was not measured. Longer evenings may help people who work during the day; this does not prove every library should open fewer days. Before making the change permanent, the team will survey residents, compare costs and repeat the trial in winter, when travel habits may differ.
First rewrite
A library tried to run a trial four days a week for six weeks: 40 hours a week, but closed Wednesdays and extended Monday and Thursday evenings. Visitors increased from 1,200 to 1,320 a week, although Wednesday visitors had to make another plan. Staff complained of less interruption, but productivity was not measured. Less evenings may help those who work during the day; this doesn't mean every library should close less days. Before deciding to go permanent, the team will survey residents, compare costs, and conduct the trial again in winter, when travel habits may be different.
Parameters and feature comparison
Observed features refer to the tested plan. “Not verified” is different from “not supported.”
| Parameter | EssayDone |
|---|---|
| Free access | 300-word input cap; free uses counter showed 1 of 3 after this run. |
| Account required | No, for this completed guest run. |
| One-click rewrite | Yes, the complete sample produced a full output. |
| Word highlighting | No word-by-word change display verified in this workflow. |
| Line / sentence highlighting | No separate line or sentence change diff verified. |
| Selective rewriting | Multiple drafts and sentence alternatives are advertised; the free result showed only one variant, so selective replacement was not verified. |
| API / MCP / Agent Skills | No official humanizer API, MCP or agent skill verified in the reviewed material. |
| Paid plans | WriterGPT suite monthly plans include humanizer: Basic $19 with 10,000 words; Pro $29 with 30,000; Unlimited $49. Humanizer input caps 1,000/3,000/5,000 words. Standalone humanizer price not independently confirmed. |
| Billing unit | Word allowances plus per-input caps; the cited prices are the WriterGPT bundle. |
Score breakdown
| Dimension | Weight | Score | What we found |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meaning & facts | 30% | 4/10 | Staff reported became complained; longer evenings became Less evenings and fewer opening days became close less days. |
| Readability | 25% | 4/10 | Several grammatical and comparative phrases need repair. |
| Natural voice | 15% | 4/10 | Awkward substitutions made the report less natural than the original. |
| Editing experience | 15% | 6/10 | Complete draft with output controls; only one free variant observed, despite advertised multi-draft features. |
| Access & value | 10% | 7/10 | Free guest sample completed with a 300-word cap and three-use counter; paid suite pricing is separately disclosed. |
| Integrations | 5% | 0/10 | No official humanizer API, MCP or agent skill verified. |
Overall 4.4/10 · weighted editorial judgment of the shown workflow. Read the method.
EssayDone Humanizer review: three changes that reversed the meaning
The first Basic 4.5 output was easy to obtain, but changed the staff's sentiment and reversed parts of the opening-hours discussion. The result needs a factual repair, not just polishing.
Read the analysis and recommendationSources and limits
- Official humanizer and free run · checked 2026-10-27
- WriterGPT plans including humanizer allowances · checked 2026-10-27
One short English sample and the first captured output in the stated mode. Paid models, long documents, external detectors and live integrations were not tested. Pricing is a dated snapshot; documentation is not an end-to-end integration test.